Preface

Hope is the thing with feathers — 
That perches in the soul

— “Hope is the thing with feathers (254),” Emily Dickinson

PREFACE

Is it gauche to quote a lovely and very famous poem, and then immediately pivot to quoting yourself? Maybe.

“You should know that the whole time, when we’re talking about numbers, we’re going to be having feelings.”

We said that back in our 2021 edition, and if there were an official M+R Benchmarks motto, that would be it. 

Back then, we were reflecting on the astounding upwelling of support for nonprofits through the first year of the Covid pandemic. The data showed higher revenue numbers; it also revealed compassion, generosity, community in a time of isolation.  

Once again this year, we have so, so much data to share with you: literally millions of interactions, billions of dollars, so many numbers. Our objective is to help you use this data to shed light on your own program and find opportunities to advance your cause. 

We also, the whole time, will be having feelings. About what the numbers say about supporters. About how each gift and petition signature is an expression of someone’s values, identity, hopes, fears, defiance, outrage, grief, empathy, courage, curiosity, solidarity, remembrance, frustration, heartbreak, every human thing but resignation.

No matter how many new metrics we report or how much detail we cram into our charts, they can’t hope to capture that context. So, we’re sharing some poetry in this year’s Benchmarks alongside the usual data and analysis.

This is a hard, hard time to be a nonprofit professional human. We are grateful to the 216 nonprofit participants in this year’s M+R Benchmarks Study — for contributing data and answering all our questions, yes, and also for being excellent people who do enormously valuable work to alleviate suffering, enlighten minds, and advance equality. 

If you are one of those participants, we want you to know how much we appreciate your contributions. (If you are Elizabeth Barrett Browning, we want you to know we are terribly sorry.)

A Sonnet for M+R Benchmarks Participants

How do we love you? Let us count the ways.

We love you to the depth and breadth and height

Our charts can reach, as every point we cite

Depends upon your data and your grace.

We love you for the trends you help us trace,

The insights that surprise, inspire, excite.

We love your data, the truths you bring to light.

We love your patience, for questions that we raise.

We love the serious nerds who love to use

This Benchmarks Study, which more or less

Could not exist without all you who choose

To join the fun. We love you all to death —

For sharing all the clicks and gifts and views,

And making this Study (hopefully) our best.

Thank you to all our participants, our partners at Rally UK, and everyone who contributed to this study.

Now, ready to go look at some numbers and have some feelings?

I Celebrate myself, and sing myself…1

We are M+R

We believe that the nonprofits we work for are essential to advancing the cause of justice, alleviating suffering, and solving the greatest challenges we face.

We bring experience, talent, and unshakable dedication to our clients through fundraising and supporter engagement, movement building and issue advocacy, and message and brand development.

We have more resources, advice, tools, and other fun stuff waiting for you at www.mrss.com

1 “Song of Myself, 1” by Walt Whitman

Benchmarks Editorial Team

  • Writing / Will Valverde
  • Data Analytics / Jonathan Benton / Theresa Bugeaud / Lia Mancuso / Michelle Hertel / Alec MacIntyre / Evan Aczon
  • Design / Laura Klavon
  • Website Development / Bobby Burch / Tom Giordano
  • Participation Management / Lucy Midelfort
  • Project Management / Bobby Goldstein
  • Insights / Diego Ruiz / Lia Mancuso / Rachael Wolber / Sarah DiJulio / Sarah Coughlon / Michelle Stikeleather / Miranda Carter / Marium Navid / Yasmin Harrell / Jessica Bosanko / Marc Ruben
  • QA / Anne Paschkopic / Michelle Hertel / Evan Aczon / Dan Stevens / Porscha Stiger / Alec MacIntyre / Evan Aczon
  • Marketing / Laura Klavon / Linda Zhang / Lucy Midelfort / Madeline Stanionis / Marium Navid
  • Publisher / Madeline Stanionis

Metrical Feats

Here’s what you need to know about how we count things:

  1. Wherever possible, we have broken out the findings by sector. Each of our participants self-identified the appropriate sector (or, in some cases, fell outside of our defined sectors and selected “Other”). If you are not sure which sector represents your peer group, review the full list of participants to find where you belong.
  2. We also sort our participants by size. For our study, “Small” refers to nonprofits with annual online revenue in 2024 below $500,000; “Medium” is those nonprofits with annual online revenue between $500,000 and $3,000,000; and “Large” covers all those with annual online revenue greater than $3,000,000.
  3. The averages displayed in each chart and discussed throughout Benchmarks represent the median figure for a given metric for all participants who reported data. We do this to avoid having one or two outliers with extraordinary results from having too much influence, as might happen with a mean average.
  4. Not all participants were able to provide data for every metric. If a chart does not include data for a certain sector or size, it’s because we were not able to collect enough results to report a reliable average.
  5. In addition to the median figure, some charts display a range showing the 25th percentile to the 75th percentile. Half of all reported values fell within this range, which can be considered “normal” results for participants in our study.
  6. Some fundraising data excludes individual donations over $10,000. We identify in each chart if it includes gifts over $10,000.
  7. Shall I compare thee…se results to what was reported in the 2024 Benchmarks Study? No. Don’t do that. We have a different pool of participants this year, so those comparisons would mislead. Wherever we report year-over-year changes, we are including long-term data from this year’s participants. (Who are, by the way, both lovely and temperate.)

Download the full Benchmarks Study

Read the PDF for every line of analysis, all charts, and a few surprises.